At 4:11 this morning, President Donald J. Trump’s social media account posted: “All of those countries that can’t get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you: Number 1, buy from the U.S., we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, to to the Strait, and just TAKE IT. You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil! President DJT” While this morning, Trump appeared to wash his hands of his Iran war, there was an undertone of panic in his post, especially coming as it did just before an exclusive story by Alexander Ward and Meridith McGraw in the Wall Street Journal reporting that Trump has “told aides he is willing to end the military campaign against Iran even if the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed.” Economist Paul Krugman noted this evening that this is essentially an admission of defeat, and Suzanne Maloney, vice president of the Brookings Institution think tank and an expert on Iran, called Trump’s suggestion that he is willing to leave the strait closed “unbelievably irresponsible.” Having started a war, she said, the U.S. and Israel cannot walk away from the outcome. “Energy markets are inherently global, and there is no possibility of insulating the U.S. from the economic damage that is already occurring and will become exponentially worse if the closure of the strait continues,” she told the Wall Street Journal reporters. Nonetheless, the idea the Iran War would end soon was a signal investors wanted to see. On the strength of the hope for a short war, the stock market posted its biggest one-day gain in ten months. Meanwhile, another aircraft carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, left its home port, Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia, today to head in the direction of the Middle East, although it is not clear if it will support Operation Epic Fury. According to Alison Bath of Stars and Stripes, the carrier will pick up other elements of the carrier group, including the destroyers USS Ross, USS Donald Cook, and USS Mason, as it crosses the Atlantic. The George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group also includes several aircraft squadrons and detachments that make up the 70 or more aircraft in Carrier Air Wing 7, along with more than 5,000 sailors and military personnel. Nearly 3,500 sailors and Marines from the Tripoli Amphibious Ready Group arrived in the region on Saturday. Yesterday, host Laura Ingraham of the Fox News Channel wondered, “[W]as the president fully briefed about the risks of all of this from the beginning? And was he then able to take it all in and understand the complexity of this? How complex it could actually get, and further possibilities of casualties or other damage—the difficulty of dealing with these people? Or was he told this would be relatively quick, in and out?” Nick Hilden of AlterNet reported that MAGA leader Alex Jones speculated today that ill-health is contributing to Trump’s poor decisions on Iran. “Trump’s run off the edge of a cliff, and I don’t think he’s coming back from it,” Jones said. He urged MAGA to move on without Trump. “We cut bait on Trump and we mobilize against the Democrats,” he said. “Trump is just a minor figure.” Hunter Walker of Talking Points Memo picked up the story of another MAGA figure distancing himself from Trump. When he ran for governor in 2024, former North Carolina lieutenant governor Mark Robinson flat out denied stories about his participation in pornography forums and social media chats where he attacked Jewish, Black, gay, and transgender people as well as flirting with Holocaust denial and calling himself a “black NAZI!” He even sued CNN for $50 million for defamation, calling their story about him “a high-tech lynching” before dropping the suit after losing the election. Walker noted that Robinson recently admitted on a podcast that he was lying all along. He “had to ignore the truth at that moment,” he said, because he was shielding Trump. “I certainly don’t want to be the person that costs the president of the United States the election,” he said. “Didn’t want to cost anyone else their election.” Asked if he would do it again, he answered: “I’d make the exact same decision. I’d fight in the exact same way.” After Saturday’s No Kings rallies around the country and the world, and after new polls showing his job approval ratings have dropped to new lows, Trump this afternoon signed an executive order attacking mail-in voting. Although both Democratic and Republican election officials insist mail-in voting is secure and reliable, Trump claims it permits Democrats to cheat. Ironically, earlier this month the story broke of a right-wing activist in Wisconsin who ordered ballots in other people’s names to prove that mail-in voting enabled voter fraud. Last week Harry Wait was convicted of one felony count of identity theft and two misdemeanor counts of election fraud, suggesting mail-in voting is not as insecure as he thought. Nonetheless, Trump is ordering the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to work with the Social Security Administration to create a list of verified U.S. citizens who are eligible to vote in each state. The order directs the U.S. Postal Service to send mail-in ballots only to voters on the list, and to mark each ballot with its own unique barcode. It threatens any states refusing to cooperate with the order with a loss of federal funding and directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate anyone wrongfully distributing mail-in ballots. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council notes that “there is no such thing as a federal list of citizens. It does not exist.” “This is unconstitutional on its face,” election law expert David Becker told Yunior Rivas of Democracy Docket. “The Constitution clearly gives the president no power over elections.” The Senate Rules Committee oversees federal involvement in elections, and its top Democrat, Alex Padilla (D-CA), called the order a “blatant, unconstitutional abuse of power,” adding that Trump has “no authority to commandeer federal elections or direct the Postal Service to undermine mail and absentee voting.” Representative Joe Morelle (D-NY), the top-ranking Democrat on the House Administration Committee, said that the order is “illegal, dangerous and subversive” and that “Donald Trump fears the American people and is willing to violate the Constitution to stop them from voting.” “See you in court,” posted Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). “You will lose.” Another of Trump’s executive orders was in court today, when Judge Randolph Moss of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that much of Trump’s order stripping NPR and PBS of funds was unconstitutional. As Brian Stelter of CNN reported, Moss quoted a Supreme Court ruling when he wrote: “The First Amendment draws a line, which the government may not cross, at efforts to use government power—including the power of the purse—‘to punish or suppress disfavored expression’ by others.” Republicans in Congress have since voted to cut federal funding from NPR and PBS, but the decision is a victory for the First Amendment. Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia also stymied Trump today when he ruled that Trump cannot proceed with his plans for a giant ballroom on the site of the demolished East Wing of the White House without approval from Congress. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has sued Trump and a number of federal agencies to stop construction of the ballroom, noting that Trump skipped reviews and approvals that were required by law. The decision by Leon, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, begins: “The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!” It goes on to say that “no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims…to construct his East Wing ballroom project and do it with private funds,” and points out that Trump appears to be relying for authority on a law permitting him “to conduct ordinary maintenance and repair of the White House.” Leon also noted that the White House has offered vague and shifting information about who is actually in charge of the project and that the public has an interest in the appearance of the White House. Leon said “the ballroom construction project must stop until Congress authorizes its completion.” The Department of Justice has already appealed. Trump exploded at the judge’s decision, posting on social media: “The National Trust for Historic Preservation sues me for a Ballroom that is under budget, ahead of schedule, being built at no cost to the Taxpayer, and will be the finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World. I then get sued by them over the renovation of the dilapidated and structurally unsound former Kennedy Center, now, The Trump Kennedy Center (A show of Bipartisan Unity, a Republican and Democrat President!), where all I am doing is fixing, cleaning, running, and ‘sprucing up’ a terribly maintained, for many years, Building, but a Building of potentially great importance. Yet, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a Radical Left Group of Lunatics whose funding was stopped by Congress in 2005, is not suing the Federal Reserve for a Building which has been decimated and destroyed, inside and out, by an incompetent and possibly corrupt Fed Chairman. The once magnificent Building is BILLIONS over budget, may never be completed, and may never open. All of the beautiful walls inside have been ripped down, never to be built again, but the National ‘Trust’ for Historic Preservation never did anything about it! Or, have they sued on Governor Gavin Newscum’s ‘RAILROAD TO NOWHERE’ in California that is BILLIONS over Budget and, probably, will never open or be used. So, the White House Ballroom, and The Trump Kennedy Center, which are under budget, ahead of schedule, and will be among the most magnificent Buildings of their kind anywhere in the World, gets [sic] sued by a group that was cut off by Government years ago, but all of the many DISASTERS in our Country are left alone to die. Doesn’t make much sense, does it? President DONALD J. TRUMP” Hours later, he posted: “Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and I are working on fixing the absolutely filthy Reflecting Pool between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument. This work was supposed to be done by the Biden Administration, but Sleepy Joe doesn’t know what ‘CLEAN’ or proper maintenance is—The President and Secretary do!” Tonight Summer Said, David S. Cloud, and Michael Amon of the Wall Street Journal reported that the United Arab Emirates is trying to get a United Nations Security Council resolution to call for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. The UAE says it will help the U.S. and other allies open the strait by force. — Notes: https://www.citizen.org/article/big-ugly-threat/ https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-iran-war-strait-of-hormuz-ee950ad4 https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-nasdaq-03-31-2026 https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5807214-iran-threatens-us-troops/ https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/5809190-ingraham-questions-trump-iran/ https://www.alternet.org/alex-jones-trump-2676644939/ https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/mark-robinson-comes-clean-sort-of-and-tries-to-sell-some-content https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-signs-sweeping-order-attacking-mail-in-voting/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/24/activist-voter-fraud-mail-wisconsin/ https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/31/media/federal-judge-trump-order-npr-pbs-funding https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645.60.0_2.pdf https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/uae-iran-war-strait-of-hormuz-9836ecbb X: RonFilipkowski/status/2039125968661422402 Bluesky: meidastouch.com/post/3mie4uwx4kk2f meidastouch.com/post/3miewolrgvd2g You’re currently a free subscriber to Letters from an American. If you need help receiving Letters, changing your email address, or unsubscribing, please visit our Support FAQ. You can also submit a help request directly. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. |
Tuesday, March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026
It’s Our House
You could skim the headlines—but they won’t tell you what this ruling actually does or why it matters. I’ve read the decision line by line and translated it into plain English, so you can see exactly how a federal judge just stopped Trump in his tracks. If you value this kind of understanding, paid subscriptions to Civil Discourse make this work possible. In an important win for people who understand that the Constitution establishes a president, not a king, as the leader of the United States, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to stop construction on the ballroom Trump destroyed the East Wing of the White House to build. The Judge pointed out it’s not Donald Trump’s house and held that without approval from Congress, no dice. Read the full opinion here. Senior Judge Richard Leon in the District of Columbia did the honors. He was appointed by George W. Bush in 2002, so, not exactly a liberal. The issue comes down to whether Trump has the legal authority to tear down the East Wing and build a ballroom. “Because Congress holds the keys to the Nation's property, the President must have some statutory basis to build the ballroom,” Judge Leon explains. After analyzing the issues, he entered a preliminary injunction, calling a halt to further work on the ballroom. He wrote of his ruling: “Where does this leave us? Unfortunately for Defendants, unless and until Congress blesses this project through statutory authorization, construction has to stop! But here is the good news. It is not too late for Congress to authorize the continued construction of the ballroom project. The President may at any time go to Congress to obtain express authority to construct a ballroom and to do so with private funds. Indeed, Congress may even choose to appropriate funds for the ballroom, or at least decide that some other funding scheme is acceptable. Either way, Congress will thereby retain its authority over the nation’s property and its oversight over the Government’s spending. The National Trust’s interests in a constitutional and lawful process will be vindicated. And the American people will benefit from the branches of Government exercising their constitutionally prescribed roles. Not a bad outcome, that!” It’s hard to tell if that’s a touch of sarcasm or a sincere effort to save the president’s pet project. The Judge has a bit of a reputation for being a “vivid writer” who has never hesitated to criticize the government when he thought it deserved it. Either way, the Judge struck a sharp blow for the rule of law today and, not entirely coincidentally, halted construction of a project many Americans strongly oppose. Building a ballroom instead of feeding, educating, and providing basic medical care for Americans feels very “Let them eat cake” at a time when many Americans are struggling to afford the price of gasoline, which has skyrocketed because of another one of the president’s pet projects. The opinion begins with Judge Leon’s acknowledgment that: “the President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!” The Judge proceeds to lay out the position each side in this dispute staked out in court:
Judge Leon writes, “I have concluded that the National Trust is likely to succeed on the merits because no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have. As such, I must therefore GRANT the National Trust’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and the ballroom construction project must stop until Congress authorizes its completion.” It’s a smackdown. Congress first authorized the creation of a place for the president to live in the Residence Act of 1790, which created a commission to “provide suitable buildings for the accommodation of ... the President,” Judge Leon explains. President Adams moved in before construction was finished and every President since then has lived in the White House. “Congress has continued to authorize and fund construction and maintenance at the White House up until the present day.” As for Trump’s ballroom, the Judge points out that “without advance notice or apparent approval-President Trump announced on social media that ‘ground ha[ d] been broken on the White House grounds to build the new, big, beautiful White House Ballroom.’” That was October 20, 2025. The next day, there were reports of heavy machinery on the White House grounds. Trump showed the press renderings of what he had in mind, commenting that while other presidents had made changes to the White House, his would be the “biggest one,” the day after that. By October 23, the East Wing had been demolished. Back in July of 2025, Trump had announced a plan to build a ballroom that would be “approximately 90,000 total square feet.” But he never went to Congress for funding or submitted his plans for approval. He moved straight to tearing down the East Wing. The Judge writes that Trump lacked the authority to do that, concluding the National Trust is likely to succeed in its claims, and so, is entitled to an injunction. “The Property Clause vests Congress with complete authority over public lands. See U.S. Const. Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2 (‘The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.’).” Moreover, he writes, “Since the earliest days of our Republic, Congress's 'power over the purse' has been its 'most complete and effectual weapon' to ensure that the other branches do not exceed or abuse their authority.” So, Congress controls public lands, which includes the White House, and the separation of powers includes Congress’ power over the purse, which is a way of keeping other branches of government from exceeding their authority. Congress also has authority over the District of Columbia under the “District Clause,” Art. I, § 8, cl. 17 of the Constitution. Trump struck out on legal authority to act on his own without enlisting Congress. “[T]he President must identify some law that allows him to demolish the East Wing and construct his planned ballroom with private funds,” Judge Leon writes. But all of the law goes the other way, which leads the Judge to conclude he’s going to lose on the argument raised by the National Trust that Trump acted beyond his authority, or “ultra vires” as the legal doctrine puts it, because “no law comes close to giving the President this authority.” Trump tried to cobble together an argument based on a law that authorizes “Assistance and Services for the President,” But Judge Leon is quick to point out that the provision, 3 U.S.C. § 105(d)(l), “is a statute authorizing the President to conduct ordinary maintenance and repair of the White House, up to the limits of the congressionally appropriated amount.” No help for Trump there, and the tenuousness of the argument suggests that Trump forged ahead and did something he wanted to do, figuring that once the East Wing was destroyed, there would be little anyone could do. “Defendants' reading of the statute is clearly contrary to its plain meaning,” Judge Leon concludes. The National Trust also has to establish irreparable injury before it’s entitled to an injunction, meaning it has to show an actual harm that is about to take place and can’t be fixed after the fact. Here, Judge Leon relies on allegations of “aesthetic injury,” referencing a statement by a member of the National Trust, Professor Alison Hoagland, “who regularly visits President's Park to ‘enjoy the historic buildings’ and take in ‘the beauty of the L'Enfant Plan.’” Hoagland believes that construction of “a ballroom of the proposed form and scale” would cause “permanent and irreparable harm to the White House and President's Park,” thereby damaging her own “aesthetic, cultural, and historical interests.” That qualifies as irreparable injury in the Judge’s view because it specifies that her enjoyment of the White House grounds will be irreparably injured if Trump is permitted to go ahead. Here again, the Trump White House’s argument is a weak one. “Defendants contend that the National Trust faces no imminent aesthetic harm because Hoagland ‘will not be able to see any part of the East Wing for many months,’” Judge Leon writes, before concluding that “Defendants cannot seriously argue that Hoagland has no claim for imminent aesthetic harm until the completed building is fully visible.” Above-ground construction is slated to begin at some point in April 2026. Before entering an injunction, courts weigh the equities, trying to be fair to both parties and to the public. Here, Judge Leon concludes, “While the National Trust would be deeply harmed in the absence of an injunction, the Government ‘cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice.’" The government’s response gets the smackdown from Judge Leon that it deserves: “Defendants predictably object, arguing that any delay to construction would imperil national security and expose the White House to damage. Grasping for straws, Defendants call the construction site a ‘coordinated and managed safety hazard’ that has disrupted existing security procedures. Thus, according to Defendants, any construction delay will undermine national security. Please! While I take seriously the Government's concerns regarding the safety and security of the White House grounds and the President himself, the existence of a ‘large hole’ beside the White House is, of course, a problem of the President's own making!” Please! The Judge gives the government 14 days to appeal, and permits it to engage in any work “necessary to ensure the safety and security of the White House.” But he makes plain in a footnote that he’s serious about holding the White House to good faith in this matter: “The Court gives fair notice to Defendants, however, that any above-ground construction over the next fourteen days that is not in compliance with my Order is at risk of being taken down depending on the outcome of this case.” Trump seems upset about the decision. After all, where is an emperor supposed to show off his clothes, if not in his humongous ballroom? He followed up with this: The amazing Aaron Rupar, who has the patience of a saint and posts all the video we need to see of Trump, even when we don’t want to, captured this gem today: “Trump on a judge ruling against his ballroom: ‘It says here very carefully, 'the safety and security have to be protected on the White House grounds.' Well that's what we're doing because everything is bulletproof glass, including the ballroom ... we have a drone-proof roof'.’” Brilliant logic from the President. What’s next? A strip club with bomb shelter doors? An appeal from the White House is imminent, and perhaps the prospect of a fight over contempt, given the Judge’s footnote, above. But at least I have a head start on my sign for the next protest. It’s our house. We’re in this together, Joyce You're currently a free subscriber to Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance . For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. © 2026 Joyce Vance |
Amazon's satellite internet 🛰️, Anthropic's $800B offer 💰, Claude Code Routines 👨💻
Amazon has entered into an agreement with Apple to provide satellite service for its devices using the Amazon Leo network ...
-
On Monday, Leon County Circuit Judge Angela Dempsey rejected Bear Warriors United's request for a temporary injunction to halt the s...
-
Police say information from a Reddit tipster who had a strange encounter with another man on a sidewalk outside Brown University provi...
-
The Trump administration has launched a new federal initiative called the U.S. Tech Force, aimed at hiring about 1,000 engineers and t...



